German Contrition Dubious Dederichs

Heydrich: The Face of Evil, by Mario R. Dederichs. 2006

Heydrich Jewish? Modern Feminists Repeat Nazi Propaganda. German Guilt Dilution Spurned: Dubious Postwar German Repentance

Mario Dederich traces Heydrich’s life from his early years in the Nazi Party, through his views on resettlement of Jews (p. 100) which evolved into extermination of the same, his assassination by Czech partisans, the ghastly German reprisals, and postwar issues. Heydrich is described as a man who was ruthless even by Nazi standards. Certain neo-Nazis have hailed him as “the Naziest of the Nazis.” (p. 177).

HEYDRICH THE JEWISH NAZI?

Was Heydrich of Jewish ancestry? Dederich shows that he was commonly regarded, in Nazi circles, in that light (p. 37, 54-55). The evidence itself is inconclusive. The ancestral list, used by the SS to prove Aryan ancestry at least as far back as 1648, was “very superficial”. (p. 54). The Suss (Suess) lineage, according to the ancestral list, was Lutheran (p. 37). But does this eliminate the possibility of conversion from Judaism? Furthermore, one of Heydrich’s great-great grandmothers, Johanna Birnbaum, may have been Jewish, and, significantly, her name doesn’t appear in the documentation (p. 56).

MODERN FEMINISTS REPEATING NAZI PROPAGANDA

Heydrich held very strong anti-Christian views (p. 72, 74-75). “As did Heydrich, [Professor Alfred] Six identified the main enemies of the Reich as being the freemasonry, the Jews, and the Churches.” (p. 99). In addition, Dederich notes: “…Himmler’s allegation that medieval witchcraft trials were actually an attack by Roman Catholicism on German womanhood.” (p. 100). Interestingly, some modern feminists have followed in Himmler’s footsteps by leveling a similar accusation against the Church and calling it gynocide.

GERMANS WERE GERMANS: NO VALID DICHOTOMY BETWEEN NAZI AND NON-NAZI GERMANS

Not only the Einsatzgruppen but also the Wehrmacht had been involved in shootings of large numbers of civilians (p. 111). Dederich puts the subsequent Wannsee conference in perspective: “The Wannsee conference was not the beginning of the genocide; Heydrich had initiated that with the Einsatzgruppen in Poland in 1939 and in the Soviet Union in 1941. The death camps…had been in existence for some time.” (p. 134).

NO GERMAN GUILT DIFFUSION: DUBIOUSLY-GENUINE POSTWAR GERMAN REPENTANCE OVER NAZISM

As for the postwar war-crimes trials in West Germany, Dederich discusses how Pole-killers and Jew-killers such as Werner Best and Bruno Streckenbach escaped justice through various medical-related technicalities. Furthermore, he adds: “Not a single head of the RSHA Polish Division IVD2 ever came before a court.” (p. 183).

Finally, Dederich concludes: “It is clear that of all the direct Heydrich descendants, not one has ever uttered publicly a word of regret about the crimes committed by their ancestor. Never have they furnished a gesture towards the Jews, Poles, or the survivors of Lidice.” (p. 189).